Michigan

  Intellectual Property Lawyers.
HOME ABOUT US FAQ'S RESOURCES CONTACT US FREE CASE REVIEW
February 06, 2012
Intellectual-Property
             
 
Selecting an attorney for legal cases is a very important decision. Please enter your information below to receive a Free Consultation from an attorney in your area:
 
Zip Code:   
 

Intellectual Property News

 

ITC Institutes Investigation On Certain Lighting Control Devices

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has voted to institute an investigation of certain lighting control devices including dimmer switches and/or switches. The products at issue in this investigation are devices for controlling light and its intensity.

The investigation is based on a complaint filed by Lutron Electronics Co. of Coopersburg, PA, on March 2, 2007. An amended complaint was filed on March 19, 2007. The amended complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 in the importation into the United States of certain lighting control devices including dimmer switches and/or switches that infringe patents owned by Lutron. The complainant requests that the ITC issue a permanent exclusion order and a permanent cease and desist order.

The ITC has identified Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc., of Little Neck, NY, and Control4 of Salt Lake City, UT, as the respondents in this investigation.

By instituting this investigation (337-TA-599), the ITC has not yet made any decision on the merits of the case. The case will be referred to the Honorable Robert L. Barton, an ITC administrative law judge, who will schedule and hold an evidentiary hearing. Judge Barton will make an initial determination as to whether there is a violation of section 337; that initial determination is subject to review by the Commission.

The ITC will make a final determination in the investigation at the earliest practicable time. Within 45 days after institution of the investigation, the ITC will set a target date for completing the investigation. ITC remedial orders in section 337 cases are effective when issued and become final 60 days after issuance unless disapproved for policy reasons by the U.S. Trade Representative within that 60-day period.

Contact our Michigan Intellectual Property Lawyer Now!

 

 
Did You Know?    
 
 
The antitrust laws have improved over time.
Antitrust law and policy have dramatically improved since the 1970s.

 


  Newsroom  
 


News about Intellectual Property cases in Michigan and nationwide:

Department Of Justice Will Not Oppose Proposal On Patent Information Policy
The Department of Justice announced today that it will not oppose a proposal by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. (IEEE) t...
Read more >


Intellectual Property Rights
2006 Progress Report Announces Implementation of  Task Force’s Previous Recommendations

WASHINGTON—Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzale...

Read more >


New Office Focused on Intellectual Property
Washington, DC – Following a meeting with House Majority Whip Roy Blunt, United States Trade Representative Susan Schwab today announced the creati...
Read more >


More Intellectual Property News >

 
 

Intellectual Property Terms

 


Today's Terms

Infringer

Definition:
A person or company who copies copyrighted material without permission or authorization.

Intellectual property

Definition:
Property refers to intangible property rights such as copyright, patents and trademarks that provide the owner with certain exclusive rights.

Trade Dress

Definition:
The totality of elements in which a product or service is packaged or presented, such as the shape and appearance of a product or container, or the cover of a book or magazine.

More Intellectual Property Terms >

 

Intellect. Property Resources

 


Search Intellectual Property resources in our resource center:

More Resources >

 

Intellectual Property Hot Topics

 


Topics Related to Intellectual Property:

  • Copyright Issues
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Unfair Competition Concerns
  • Right of Publicity Questions
  • Confidentiality Agreement
  • Patent Corporation Treaty

More Intellectual Property Topics >

Michigan Intellectual-Property Attorney

 
If you live in the following cities and need an Intellectual-Property attorney you should contact our Intellectual-Property Attorney as soon as possible:

  • Adrian
  • Ann Arbor
  • Battle Creek
  • Bay City
  • Belleville
  • Canton
  • Clinton Township
  • Dearborn
  • Dearborn Heights
  • Detroit
  • East Lansing
  • Flint
  • Grand Blanc
  • Grand Rapids
  • Hamtramck
  • Highland Park
  • Holland
  • Howell
  • Jackson
  • Lansing
  • Lincoln Park
  • Livonia
  • Macomb
  • Mount Pleasant
  • Muskegon
  • Niles
  • Northville
  • Plymouth
  • Port Huron
  • Redford
  • Rochester
  • Roseville
  • Saginaw
  • Sterling Heights
  • Taylor
  • Traverse City
  • Trenton
  • Troy
  • Warren
  • Westland
  • Wyandotte
  • Ypsilanti
s
 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on Michigan Intellectual Property Lawyers.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2012 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.